Welcome to Business and Politics

 
Roger Steare
James Sale
Charles Crawford
Jonathan Gabay
Rachel Marsden
Tarique Ghaffur
John Willman
 
Home  |
 

The potential end of Leo the Lion?

 
Has MGM roared its last?

Has MGM roared its last?

When I was a kid, my entire family went to see a marvelous movie showing in Marble Arch London. ‘That’s Entertainment’ celebrated the musical history of one of the world’s greatest show brands in the world- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Now, with great sadness I learn that the once most powerful and prestigious film studio in all Hollywood, has begun a search to explore a “potential sale” as the brand icon looks for a buyer to bail it out of nearly $4bn (£2.4bn) of debt. (It sounds like a tragic parody of Paramount’s Sunset Boulevard, in which Mr. Meyer himself had to step in to offer a little reality to a fading Hollywood icon.

According to reports, MGM has 140 key lenders who are owed $3.7bn (approx. £2.1bn) in bonds. As with the blockbuster out this weekend in the UK ‘2012’, the bonds will mature and so come to an abrupt end in the same year that shares the disaster movie’s apocryphal title.

The last picture show?

In a statement, MGM has been granted a postponement from interest fee payments until 31 January 2010. This allows the studio to complete three movies currently in post production: ‘Hot Tub Time Machine’, With John Cusack, Lizzy Caplan, and Crispin Glover. ‘Red Dawn’; about teenagers trying to save their town from an invasion of Chinese and Russian soldiers, and ‘The Zookeeper’, about zoo animals who plan to help their lovable zookeeper.

According to Reuters, investment bank Moelis & Co, hired by MGM in May to help refinance its debt, will be overseeing the potential sale process.   The initial goal is setting a price for the studio with the aim of getting the maximum value for investors whether by selling the studio in pieces or as a whole.

The studio, faces debt obligations  stemming from its 2005 buyout, as well as payments on a $250 million revolving credit facility due April 2010.

It was purchased from majority owner Kirk Kerkorian for $2.85 billion by a group including private equity firms Providence Equity Partners; TPG [TPG.UL]; DLJ Merchant Banking Partners, a unit of Credit Suisse (CSGN.VX); and Quadrangle Group; and media firms Sony Corp (6758.T) and Comcast Corp (CMCSA.O). The group also assumed a debt of $2 billion.

MGM was founded in 1924 following the merger of Metro Pictures, Goldwyn Pictures, and Louis B Mayer Company, MGM’s halcyon days were between the 1930s and 1950s, when the studio created some of the most distinguished movies of all time, including The Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind, Singin’ in the Rain and countless other Academy Award winning cinematographic classics.

During the 1960s, studio profits weakened, mergers, takeovers and sales left MGM deeply in debt. In recent years DVD sales plummeted and some recent poor movie choices such as Fame’ – which so far has only made a reported $42m worldwide, left shareholders irritated.

So what can the studio do? One widely reported option is to sell off MGM’s wonderful library of 4,000 movie and television shows, including Rocky, The Hobbit, and Dances With Wolves.

Part of the current library is the lucrative James Bond franchise, leased to Sony Pictures for ‘Casino Royale’ and ‘Quantum of Solace.’ Industry sources suggest that one studio or investor may even bid to acquire solely the rights to 007 or even the popular ‘Stargate’ television franchise.

Any MGM library catalogue would be of interest to TV broadcasters like BSkyB who, like Turner before them, could yield the content into a highly attractive package for viewers.

Separately MGM could sell off its lion trademark. However, that could lead to the buyer company slapping on the famous Leo the lion icon onto any old movie or programme it so wished. In doing so, giving such a movie the allure of MGM quality but not the guarantee. (That should be interesting in terms of copyright infringement laws – the company owns the logo but not the library content).

The King of the Hollywood jungle

The King of the Hollywood jungle

The brand – Your greatest asset

The Leo the Lion icon is a classic case of a brand name being its greatest asset. On the other hand this particular movie plot also carries the classic warning that when you buy a brand name, you must also invest in that brand’s values – including its product, people, and certainly in MGM’s case, heritage.

Beyond Hollywood, MGM’s brand has enjoyed success with ventures such as MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas as well as lucrative deals with Disney

Rumoured potential buyers include Time Warner Inc, the parent of the Warner Bros studio, and News Corp, home of 20th Century Fox. Other media moguls have also expressed interest. The hot contender is Michael Burns, Vice Chairman of Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation who said: “They have fantastic franchises like James Bond, they have half of The Hobbit. Of course it’s interesting to us.”

Whatever happens to MGM once the deals been struck it won’t be just a question of “that’s entertainment” but “that’s business”.

I can only hope that the new custodians of the brand will remember their obligation – in this case to put the show before the business – because whatever the economy, whatever the politics, from war to peace, bust to boom, for audiences the world over, that’s what must go on.

JJ Gabay avatarJonathan Gabay is the founder of Brand Forensics and on the core faculty of the The Chartered Institute of Marketing. For more information or to contact Jonathan Gabay click here.

[twitter]

 

JJ Gabay Open Posts

 
 
 
 
  1. JJ
    November 15th, 2009 at 23:09 | #1

    This does not bode well fore those of us born under the sign of Leo!

  2. November 18th, 2009 at 01:31 | #2

    Don’t know where your getting YOUR info from but MGM is owned by a very financially set SONY Industries – and is in no way for sale…according to a SONY exec…MGM was already SONY’s when everyone else was placing bids. Coincidently – the own Columbia Pictures as well.

  3. Anonymous
    November 18th, 2009 at 09:09 | #3

    The details of the piece are conformed by Variety magazineN NBC news and The Daily Telegraph

  4. Anonymous
    November 18th, 2009 at 09:11 | #4

    Thanks for your comment. The sources for the piece include Variety magazineN NBC news and The Daily Telegraph

 
  1. No trackbacks yet.
 
 
 

THE THINK TANK THAT TALKS

 

Join our live debates

 

Join the debate with the Business & Politics authors and high profile guest panellists at our live events.

 
 
 

Archives


 
 
 

Latest Tweets


BBC DG Mark Thompson: under the Microscope – Charles Crawford http://bit.ly/cQHM4x 2 days ago

RT @JohnWillman: Amazed it's taken so long for commentators to realise bank rescues would be profitable for government.They always are in UK 2 days ago

Spiked: Brendan O’Neill on David M vs Ed M. It’s the end of politics as we knew it http://bit.ly/9HEc4h 2 days ago

Rachel Marsden at Business and Politics - immigration and Canada http://www.businessandpolitics.org 3 days ago