With all the resources of state power overwhelmingly and indiscriminately stacked to his advantage, Nicolas Maduro’s failure to win Venezuela’s presidential election by a convincing margin, as predicted by polls, marks a dramatic defeat for Chavismo and its handpicked successor.
With less than two months since President Hugo Chavez’s death and barely half the votes, Maduro has no popular mandate but will undoubtedly claim one by continuing to relentlessly invoke the name of Hugo Chavez.
Whereas opposition leader Henrique Capriles had less than two weeks to campaign, Maduro effectively began electioneering on December 10, 2012, when Chavez officially anointed him as his heir before departing for cancer treatment in Cuba.
Nearly three months of consistent constitutional violations and blatant abuses of power ensued. The complete lack of transparency of Hugo Chavez’s medical condition was accompanied by the systematic manipulation of state institutions to choreograph the transition of power to Nicolas Maduro. Despite attempts to emulate Chavez’s fiery rhetoric and campaign tactics, the current electoral outcome has largely exposed this entire process as a farce.
In theory, a close election outcome in a bitterly polarized society should trigger a process of outreach and reconciliation. However, in Venezuela it is likely provoke a period of greater political uncertainty and social instability and further radicalization of Chavista forces.
Maduro and his allies will firmly dig in their heels and use whatever means necessary to neutralize the opposition. Nothing can be excluded from the state’s arsenal of measures, including the threat of violence or its actual use, even if confronted by peaceful expressions of protest.
By manipulating complete control of state institutions, primarily the courts, security services and electoral authority, Maduro and friends will use any pretext to crack down on the opposition.
In the days and weeks ahead, democracy in Venezuela, and throughout Latin America, will be fully tested. The international community has a responsibility not to stand by idly. In particular, Latin American states beyond the Chavista sphere of influence must raise their voices to support a fair democratic process, and not just a free one. As the rising regional power and global player, Brazil must lead the charge if necessary.
Marco Vicenzino, Washington, 16 April 2013
Marco Vicenzino is director of Global Strategy Project, a geo-political risk and international business advisory firm in London and Washington, DC. This article also appeared at Huffington Post.
RT @tonyveitchUK: Apple: @jonathangabay, slowing falling out of love. #bookofjobs #expelledfromeden
How much do England & Wales' police & crime commissioners cost & how many staff do they employ? @BBCDomC reports
@ruskin147 it was a bit confused ( bio replacement, warfare) and didn't really raise the impt questions impact on work and culture etc
Clegg tackled Google chief Eric Schmidt on tax after Cameron ducked issue
@peterkyle Adonis book makes clear Clegg/Laws sought this partnership. They cannot now moan that some Tories are anti Europe/Gay marriage.
'Most of the people you are descended from are no more genetically related to you than strangers are'
Height of creativity - a butcher has found a way to marry marijuana & meat. Pot-infused bacon? #Munchies
@benjamincohen he can be very effective personally but his meandering strategy and party management make him unnecessarily weak
@CrippledFox @jonsnowC4 Which part of my job isn't proper?
I which I give the vapid US #StateDepartment urgent drafting help for its words on #Iran's unfree/unfair elections
Welcome to Twitter @ErnestMoniz, Secretary of @Energy and our latest U.S. Cabinet Member to join @Twitter.
Scotland Institute's ground breaking report on how youth unemployment changed ovr 20yrs available for download here: 

